4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Abnormal uterine bleeding: a review of patient-based outcome measures

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 92, Issue 1, Pages 205-216

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.023

Keywords

Patient-based outcome measures; abnormal uterine bleeding; questionnaires; menstrual bleeding

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [K12 HD050108, L30 HD048287, L30 HD048287-02, K12-HD 050108-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To summarize and evaluate the patient-based outcome measures (PBOMs) that have been used to study women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). Design: Systematic review. Setting: Original articles that used at least one PBOM and were conducted within a population of women with AUB. Patient(s): Women with AUB. Intervention(s): The titles, abstracts, and studies were systematically reviewed for eligibility. The PBOMs used in eligible studies were summarized. Essential psychometric properties were identified, and a list of criteria for each property was generated. Main Outcome Measure(s): Quality of individual PBOMs as determined using the listed criteria for psychometric properties. Result(S): Nine hundred eighty-three studies referenced AUB and patient-reported outcomes. Of these, 80 studies met the eligibility criteria. Fifty different instruments were used to evaluate amount of bleeding, bleeding-related symptoms, or menstrual bleeding-specific quality of life. The quality of each of these instruments was evaluated on eight psychometric properties. The majority of instruments had no documentation of reliability, precision, or feasibility. There was no satisfactory evidence that any one instrument completely addressed all eight psychometric properties. Conclusion(s): Studies of women with AUB are increasingly using PBOMs. Many different PBOMs were used; however, no single instrument completely addressed eight important measurement properties. (Fertil Steril (R) 2009;92:205-16. (C) 2009 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available