4.3 Article

Development of a waterborne challenge model for Flavobacterium psychrophilum

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 359, Issue 2, Pages 154-160

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/1574-6968.12563

Keywords

bacterial coldwater disease; immersion challenge; iron-limited media

Categories

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture [715623, 603298, 464697, 688010]
  2. University of Idaho
  3. Washington State University Aquaculture Initiative
  4. Washington State Agricultural Research Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flavobacterium psychrophilum is the causative agent of bacterial coldwater disease and can cause significant mortality in salmonid aquaculture. To better evaluate disease prevention or treatment methods for F.psychrophilum in the laboratory, a waterborne challenge model that mimics a natural outbreak is needed. Here we report on the development of a waterborne challenge model for F.psychrophilum in which we incorporated variables that may influence challenge success: specifically, scarification prior to bacterial exposure and culture of F.psychrophilum under iron-limited culture conditions to potentially increase the probability of establishing disease. Additionally, two F.psychrophilum strains, CSF 259-93 and THC 02-90, were used in this model to test whether there were virulence differences between strains. Mortality was significantly higher in scarred fish than unscarred fish (81.5 vs. 19.4%), supporting the hypothesis that disruptions in the dermal layer enhance mortality in F.psychrophilum waterborne challenges. Although mortality differences were not significant between iron-replete and iron-limited treatments, mortality was high overall (>30%). There was a significant difference in mortality between CSF 259-93 and THC 02-90 treatments, although both strains caused high mortality in injection challenges. In conclusion, this waterborne challenge model can be used to evaluate potential disease prevention and treatment methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available