4.3 Article

Phylogeny and in situ identification of a novel gammaproteobacterium in activated sludge

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 297, Issue 2, Pages 157-163

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01676.x

Keywords

Gammaproteobacteria; activated sludge; enhanced biological phosphorus removal; FISH; microautoradiography

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Discovery Research [DP0557646DS]
  2. Smart Water
  3. Victorian State Government
  4. La Trobe University
  5. La Trobe University Institute of Advanced Studies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Failure of a continuously aerated sequencing batch reactor (SBR) pilot plant-enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) process, designed to remove phosphorus from the clarified effluent from a conventional non-EBPR wastewater treatment plant, was associated with the dominance (c. 50% of the biovolume) of gammaproteobacterial coccobacilli. Flow cytometry and subsequent clone library generation from an enriched population of these Gammaproteobacteria showed that their 16S rRNA genes were most similar to partial clone sequences obtained from an actively denitrifying SBR community, and from anaerobic : aerobic EBPR communities. Under the SBR operating conditions used here, these cells stained for poly-beta-hydroxyalkanoates, but never polyphosphate. Applying FISH probes designed against them in combination with microautoradiography showed that they could also assimilate acetate 'aerobically'. FISH analyses of biomass samples from the full-scale treatment plant providing the pilot plant feed showed that they were present there in high numbers. However, they were not detected by FISH in laboratory-scale communities of the same aerated laboratory-scale EBPR process even when EBPR had failed, or from several full-scale EBPR plants or other activated sludge processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available