4.3 Article

Regulation of expression and biochemical characterization of a β-class carbonic anhydrase from the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, Azospirillum brasilense Sp7

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 299, Issue 2, Pages 149-158

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01736.x

Keywords

Azospirillum brasilense; beta-carbonic anhydrase; expression and purification

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Biotechnology (DBT), New Delhi
  2. DBT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbonic anhydrase (CA; [EC 4.2.1.1]) is a ubiquitous enzyme catalysing the reversible hydration of CO2 to bicarbonate, a reaction that supports various biochemical and physiological functions. Genome analysis of Azospirillum brasilense, a nonphotosynthetic, nitrogen-fixing, rhizobacterium, revealed an ORF with homology to beta-class carbonic anhydrases (CAs). Biochemical characteristics of the beta-class CA of A. brasilense, analysed after cloning the gene (designated as bca), overexpressing in Escherichia coli and purifying the protein by affinity purification, revealed that the native recombinant enzyme is a homotetramer, inhibited by the known CA inhibitors. CA activity in A. brasilense cell extracts, reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR and Western blot analyses showed that bca was constitutively expressed under aerobic conditions. Lower beta-galactosidase activity in A. brasilense cells harbouring bca promoter: lacZ fusion during the stationary phase or during growth on 3% CO2 enriched air or at acidic pH indicated that the transcription of bca was downregulated by the stationary phase, elevated CO2 levels and acidic pH conditions. These observations were also supported by RT-PCR analysis. Thus, beta-CA in A. brasilense seems to be required for scavenging CO2 from the ambient air and the requirement of CO2 hydration seems to be higher for the cultures growing exponentially at neutral to alkaline pH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available