4.5 Article

Adaptive phosphate uptake behaviour of phytoplankton to environmental phosphate fluctuations

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages 1-16

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01078.x

Keywords

phosphate uptake; physiological adaptation; phytoplankton; cyanobacteria; information processing; coexistence

Categories

Funding

  1. CSIC-Universidad de la Republica
  2. PEDECIBA-Basic Science Development Program of Uruguay
  3. DINACYT-Uruguay [7026]
  4. SNI-ANII
  5. Austrian Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When phytoplankton growth in lakes is limited by the available phosphate, the external phosphate concentration fluctuates around a threshold value at which available energy is insufficient to drive phosphate incorporation into a polyphosphate pool. As a result, occasional increases in the external concentration are experienced by phytoplankton as a series of phosphate pulses. Based on [32P] phosphate uptake experiments with lake phytoplankton, we show that a community is able to process information about the experienced pattern of phosphate pulses via a complex regulation of the kinetic and energetic properties of cellular phosphate uptake systems. As a result, physiological adaptation to alterations of ambient phosphate concentration depends on the pattern of phosphate fluctuations to which the community had been exposed during its previous growth. In this process, the entire community exhibits coherent uptake behaviour with respect to a common threshold value. Thereby, different threshold values result from different antecedent pulse patterns, apparently unrestrained by the amount of previously stored phosphate. The coherent behaviour observed contradicts the basic assumptions of the competitive exclusion principle and provides an alternative perspective for explaining the paradoxical coexistence of many phytoplankton species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available