4.5 Review

Beyond 'furballs' and 'dumpling soups' - towards a molecular architecture of signaling complexes and networks

Journal

FEBS LETTERS
Volume 586, Issue 17, Pages 2740-2750

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.04.029

Keywords

Molecular architecture; Signaling complex; Signalosome; Intrinsic disorder; Macromolecular crowding; Signaling network

Funding

  1. cancer charity Heads Up
  2. Breast Cancer Campaign
  3. EU FP7 grant (TARGETBINDER)
  4. Oxford Cancer Research Centre Development Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The molecular architectures of intracellular signaling networks are largely unknown. Understanding their design principles and mechanisms of processing information is essential to grasp the molecular basis of virtually all biological processes. This is particularly challenging for human pathologies like cancers, as essentially each tumor is a unique disease with vastly deranged signaling networks. However, even in normal cells we know almost nothing. A few 'signalosomes', like the COP9 and the TCR signaling complexes have been described, but detailed structural information on their architectures is largely lacking. Similarly, many growth factor receptors, for example EGF receptor, insulin receptor and c-Met, signal via huge protein complexes built on large platform proteins (Gab, Irs/Dok, p130Cas[BCAR1], Frs families etc.), which are structurally not well understood. Subsequent higher order processing events remain even more enigmatic. We discuss here methods that can be employed to study signaling architectures, and the importance of too often neglected features like macromolecular crowding, intrinsic disorder in proteins and the sophisticated cellular infrastructures, which need to be carefully considered in order to develop a more mature understanding of cellular signal processing. (C) 2012 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available