4.6 Article

Comparative structural and functional analysis of two octaheme nitrite reductases from closely related Thioalkalivibrio species

Journal

FEBS JOURNAL
Volume 279, Issue 21, Pages 4052-4061

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08811.x

Keywords

3D structure; function; multiheme protein; octaheme nitrite reductase

Funding

  1. Federal Target Program 'Scientific and Scientific-Pedagogical Personnel of the Innovative Russia' [14.740.11.0632, P1197]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [10-04-01695, 11-04-01613]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Octaheme nitrite reductase from the haloalkaliphilic bacterium Thioalkalivibrio paradoxus was isolated and characterized. A comparative structural and functional analysis of two homologous octaheme nitrite reductases from closely related Thioalkalivibrio species was performed. It was shown that both enzymes have similar catalytic properties, owing to high structural similarity. Both enzymes are characterized by specific structural features distinguishing them from pentaheme cytochrome c nitrite reductases, such as the Tyr-Cys bond in the active site, the hexameric structure resulting in the formation of a void space inside the hexamer, and the product channel that opens into the void interior space of the hexamer. It is suggested that these specific structural features are responsible for the higher nitrite reductase activity, the greater preference for nitrite than for sulfite as a substrate, and the wider pH range of the catalytic activity of octaheme nitrite reductases than of pentaheme homologs. Database Nucleotide sequence data are available in the GenBank database under the accession number HQ665012.1. Structural data are available in the RCSB Protein Data Bank database under the accession numbers 3SXQ and 3TTB Structured digital abstract TvPaR and TvPaR bind by x-ray crystallography (View interaction)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available