4.5 Article

Numerical investigation on welding residual stresses in a PWR pressurizer safety/relief nozzle

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01480.x

Keywords

finite element simulation; PWR pressurizer safety; relief nozzle; weld overlay; welding residual stress

Funding

  1. KESRI [R-2007-2-066]
  2. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation, Engineering Research Center [2009-0063170]
  3. [M207AE030001-08A0503-00111]
  4. Korea Institute of Industrial Technology(KITECH) [R-2007-2-066-0-00] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2007-0056656, 2007-2007025] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents finite element simulation results of residual stresses in dissimilar metal welds of a PWR pressurizer safety/relief nozzle. The present results are believed to be significant in two aspects. The first one is to consider the effect of the presence of similar metal welds on resulting residual stresses. The second one is the mitigation effect of the overlay welding thickness on residual stresses. After dissimilar metal welding, tensile residual stresses are present both at the inner surface and at the outer surface of dissimilar metal welds. Adjacent similar metal welding, however, decreases residual stresses to compressive ones at the inner surface of dissimilar metal welds, possibly due to the bending mechanism caused radial contraction of the weld. At the outer surface of dissimilar metal welds, similar metal welding increases residual stresses. Overlay welding further decreases residual stresses at the inner surface of dissimilar and similar metal welds, but increases slightly residual stresses at the outer surface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available