Underestimated survival predictions of the prognostic tools Adjuvant! Online and PREDICT in BRCA1-associated breast cancer patients
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Underestimated survival predictions of the prognostic tools Adjuvant! Online and PREDICT in BRCA1-associated breast cancer patients
Authors
Keywords
BRCA1, Founder mutations, Breast cancer, Adjuvant chemotherapy
Journal
Familial Cancer
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 683-689
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2013-05-03
DOI
10.1007/s10689-013-9646-7
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Should all BRCA1 mutation carriers with stage I breast cancer receive chemotherapy?
- (2013) Steven A. Narod et al. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
- PREDICT Plus: development and validation of a prognostic model for early breast cancer that includes HER2
- (2012) G C Wishart et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Adjuvant! Online is overoptimistic in predicting survival of Asian breast cancer patients
- (2012) Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
- (2011) S. Aebi et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- Genotype-phenotype correlations among BRCA14153delA and 5382insC mutation carriers from Latvia
- (2011) Grigorijs Plakhins et al. BMC Medical Genetics
- Outcome of triple-negative breast cancer in patients with or without deleterious BRCA mutations
- (2011) Soley Bayraktar et al. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
- BRCA Mutation Testing in Determining Breast Cancer Therapy
- (2011) Karen Lisa Smith et al. CANCER JOURNAL
- A population-based validation of the prognostic model PREDICT for early breast cancer
- (2011) G.C. Wishart et al. EJSO
- Breast Cancer Prognosis inBRCA1andBRCA2Mutation Carriers: An International Prospective Breast Cancer Family Registry Population-Based Cohort Study
- (2011) Pamela J. Goodwin et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- External Validation of Adjuvant! Online Breast Cancer Prognosis Tool. Prioritising Recommendations for Improvement
- (2011) David Hajage et al. PLoS One
- Adjuvant! Online as a Decision-making Tool in Early Breast Cancer — a UK National Survey
- (2010) V. Agarwal et al. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Genetic susceptibility to breast cancer
- (2010) Nasim Mavaddat et al. Molecular Oncology
- Breast cancer assessment tools and optimizing adjuvant therapy
- (2010) Catherine Oakman et al. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
- Risk-reducing strategies for women carrying brca1/2 mutations with a focus on prophylactic surgery
- (2010) Mohamed Salhab et al. BMC Womens Health
- Prognosis of BRCA-associated breast cancer: a summary of evidence
- (2009) L. Bordeleau et al. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
- Is the breast-conserving treatment with radiotherapy appropriate in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers? Long-term results and review of the literature
- (2009) Youlia M. Kirova et al. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
- An investigation into the performance of the Adjuvant! Online prognostic programme in early breast cancer for a cohort of patients in the United Kingdom
- (2009) H E Campbell et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Pathologic Complete Response Rates in Young Women With BRCA1-Positive Breast Cancers After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
- (2009) Tomasz Byrski et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Calibration and discriminatory accuracy of prognosis calculation for breast cancer with the online Adjuvant! program: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study
- (2009) Stella Mook et al. LANCET ONCOLOGY
- Preoperative Chemotherapy: Updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27
- (2008) Priya Rastogi et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started