4.7 Article

Particle swarm optimization with justification and designed mechanisms for resource-constrained project scheduling problem

Journal

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages 7102-7111

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.059

Keywords

Scheduling; Particle swarm optimization; Justification; Resource-constrained project scheduling problem

Funding

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan (ROC) [NSC 97-2511-S-167-004-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The studied resource-constrained project scheduling problem (RCPSP) is a classical well-known problem which involves resource, precedence, and temporal constraints and has been applied to many applications. However, the RCPSP is confirmed to be an NP-hard combinatorial problem. Restated, it is hard to be solved in a reasonable time. Therefore, there are many metaheuristics-based schemes for finding near optima of RCPSP were proposed. The particle swarm optimization (PSO) is one of the metaheuristics, and has been verified being an efficient nature-inspired algorithm for many optimization problems. For enhancing the PSO efficiency in solving RCPSP, an effective scheme is suggested. The justification technique is combined with PSO as the proposed justification particle swarm optimization (JPSO), which includes other designed mechanisms. The justification technique adjusts the start time of each activity of the yielded schedule to further shorten the makespan. Moreover, schedules are generated by both forward scheduling particle swarm and backward scheduling particle swarm in this work. Additionally, a mapping scheme and a modified communication mechanism among particles with a designed gbest ratio (GR) are also proposed to further improve the efficiency of the proposed JPSO. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed JPSO provides an effective and efficient approach for solving RCPSP. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available