4.1 Review

Use of long-acting risperidone in psychiatric disorders: focus on efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 9-31

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1586/14737175.9.1.9

Keywords

adherence; antipsychotic; bipolar disorder; efficacy; long-acting risperidone; pharmacoeconomic; pharmacokinetic; remission; schizophrenia; tolerability

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  3. Cyberonics
  4. Eli Lilly
  5. Forest Therapeutics
  6. GlaxoSmithKline
  7. Janssen Pharmaceutica
  8. Lundbeck
  9. Merck Co., Inc.
  10. Novartis, Pharmaceuticals
  11. Pfizer Pharmaceuticals
  12. Pharmacia Corporation
  13. Solvay
  14. Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals
  15. Johnson Johnson

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Schizophrenia is a chronic disorder, usually necessitating lifelong treatment. Although atypical antipsychotic agents have improved outcomes in schizophrenia, their clinical potential remains limited by patients' nonadherence to medication. Long-acting antipsychotics were developed in the 1960s to enhance treatment adherence and simplify the medication process. However, although conventional long-acting agents assure medication delivery, they are associated with similar side effects to their oral equivalents. The need for an agent combining the advantages of a long-acting formulation with those of an atypical antipsychotic was highlighted in 1997 by the American Psychiatric Association's Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Schizophrenia. The first long-acting injectable atypical antipsychotic, long-acting risperidone (Risperdal Consta, Johnson & Johnson), has since been developed. This article discusses the efficacy, tolerability and cost effectiveness of long-acting risperidone in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder patients, and suggests possibilities for how its role in clinical practice may change over the next 5 years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available