Does additional hybridization also improve preimplantation genetic screening results?
Published 2010 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Does additional hybridization also improve preimplantation genetic screening results?
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages 981-985
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2010-11-17
DOI
10.1586/erm.10.94
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Improving FISH diagnosis for preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening
- (2010) P. Mir et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- Diagnostic accuracy: theoretical models for preimplantation genetic testing of a single nucleus using the fluorescence in situ hybridization technique
- (2010) P.N. Scriven et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? A position statement from the ESHRE PGD Consortium steering committee
- (2010) J. Harper et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts
- (2010) L. E. Northrop et al. MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- OMICS in assisted reproduction: possibilities and pitfalls
- (2010) E. Seli et al. MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening is significantly more consistent than FISH
- (2010) N. R. Treff et al. MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- Guidelines for good practice in PGD: programme requirements and laboratory quality assurance
- (2010) Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
- Live birth after polar body array comparative genomic hybridization prediction of embryo ploidy—the future of IVF?
- (2009) Simon Fishel et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- Preimplantation genetic screening outcomes are associated with culture conditions
- (2009) C.E. Beyer et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- Genetics: PGS
- (2009) HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- The causes of misdiagnosis and adverse outcomes in PGD
- (2009) L. Wilton et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- Karyomapping: a universal method for genome wide analysis of genetic disease based on mapping crossovers between parental haplotypes
- (2009) A. H. Handyside et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
- Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos
- (2009) Evelyne Vanneste et al. NATURE MEDICINE
- Non-informative results and monosomies in PGD: the importance of a third round of re-hybridization
- (2009) Petr Uher et al. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
- A prospective randomized controlled trial of preimplantation genetic screening in the “good prognosis” patient
- (2008) Liza R. Meyer et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- Preimplantation aneuploidy testing for infertile patients of advanced maternal age: a randomized prospective trial
- (2008) William B. Schoolcraft et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer
- (2008) C. Staessen et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? Experience with blastocyst biopsy and testing for aneuploidy
- (2008) R. P.S. Jansen et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial
- (2008) T. Hardarson et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- The current status of preimplantation genetic screening: British Fertility Society Policy and Practice Guidelines
- (2008) Richard A. Anderson et al. Human Fertility
- Preimplantation genetic screening to improve in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates: a prospective randomized controlled trial
- (2007) Jennifer E. Mersereau et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started