4.3 Review

Gastrointestinal bleeding associated with low-dose aspirin use: relevance and management in clinical practice

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 45-54

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2010.507629

Keywords

anti-inflammatory agents; aspirin; bleeding; haemorrhage; non-steroidal

Funding

  1. Bayer Schering Pharma AG
  2. AstraZeneca
  3. Bayer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Importance of the field: Aspirin reduces the risk of cardiovascular events, but it is well documented that it can also damage the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. However, the reasons why some people develop serious lesions, whereas most only have minor, clinically irrelevant lesions are poorly understood. Areas covered in this review: A number of risk factors can be used to determine which patients are more likely to develop aspirin-associated GI bleeding, mainly in the upper GI tract; these include a previous GI ulcer, ulcer complications, dyspepsia, and concomitant drug therapy with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or clopidogrel. The possible role of Helicobacter pylori infection is also considered. What the reader will gain: Aspirin-induced GI damage can be reduced, and a number of strategies can be implemented to shift the risk-benefit ratio in favour of aspirin. Proton pump inhibitors are more effective than H-2-receptor antagonists in preventing dyspeptic symptoms, peptic ulcers and bleeding ulcers in aspirin users. Although H. pylori infection may be a risk factor of aspirin-induced ulcer bleeding, the role of its eradication in the prevention of this outcome requires further investigation. Take home message: The individual assessment of the benefits and risks with aspirin, based on the underlying GI and cardiovascular risk factors, is the key to successful therapy. Understanding the effect of aspirin on colorectal cancer can also alter the risk-benefit ratio in at-risk aspirin users.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available