4.5 Review

Picoplatin pharmacokinetics and chemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages 1381-1390

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/17425255.2013.815724

Keywords

cisplatin; drug resistance; lung cancer; NSCLC; pharmacokinetics; picoplatin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Picoplatin was developed as platinum coordination complex to overcome development of resistance, through conjugation to thioles, by the introduction of a methyl-pyridine moiety into the cisplatin parent structure. Pharmacokinetic parameters of the drug, after intravenous and oral application, were studied in solid tumors and clinical Phase I - III trials performed, in particular in NSCLC and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Results showed low clinical activity of picoplatin. Areas covered: This article presents an overview of the pharmacokinetic assessments of picoplatin in lung cancer. Specifically, the authors address the relationship between disposition and clinical activity of the drug. Expert opinion: Picoplatin failed to overcome resistance to platinum compounds in lung cancer to achieve significant improved survival of most patients. Even highest doses of the drug reaching 150 m/m(2) given intravenously every 3 weeks were not sufficient to achieve better response than existing chemotherapeutics and the oral bioavailability of a dose of 200 - 400 mg corresponded only to 80 mg/m(2) iv. Picoplatin therefore seem to be quite ineffective. Picoplatin is expected to overcome tumor resistance in cases which overexpress thiol-conjugating pathways; however, this was not proved in clinical trials. To conclude, this blocked platinum complex is not able to reverse cisplatin resistance to a significant extent in vivo and its mechanisms and kinetics and of DNA damage failed to produce significant clinical results compared to second-line standard therapy for lung cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available