4.6 Article

Experimental study on cooling performance of a steam-cooled turbine blade with five internal cooling smooth channels

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages 180-187

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2014.07.004

Keywords

Gas turbine; Steam cooling; Cooling efficiency; Internal cooling

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51106124]
  2. Doctoral Program of Higher Education Research Fund [20100201120007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Advanced cooling technology is a key measure of thermal protection for turbine blades, and raising inlet gas temperature of gas turbines. Using steam as a coolant in the internal cooling channels of turbine blade can significantly reduce the consumption of air drawn from the compressors and the closed circuits convective steam cooling can help to avoid the mixing loss between the mainstream and the cooling air so as to raise the overall efficiency of gas turbine. In this study, cooling performance comparison between the steam and air is conducted on a test blade with five smooth radial convective cooling channels. The temperature and static pressure on the surface of the mid-span of the test blade are measured and the cooling performance of the blade under different cooling conditions is evaluated. Results show that the middle region of the test blade has the highest cooling effectiveness, and then the leading edge follows. The cooling effectiveness at the trailing edge is the lowest. At the same mass flow rate, the averaged cooling effectiveness of steam cooling is higher than air by about 0.12. To obtain a similar cooling performance, the consumption of cooling steam is only 40.82% of the cooling air. In conclusion, steam cooling can achieve a better cooling performance than air, and improvements of cooling structure for the trailing edge is required for steam-cooling application in the given configuration. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available