4.2 Article

Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis genotypes identified in lesions of patients with atypical or typical manifestations of tegumentary leishmaniasis: Evaluation by two molecular markers

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL PARASITOLOGY
Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages 317-322

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.exppara.2008.12.006

Keywords

Leishmaniasis, Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis; genetic variability

Categories

Funding

  1. Instituto Kinder do Brasil (IKB)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. Fundacao Carlos Chagas de Apoio a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)
  4. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analyses of MLEE, RAPD and LSSP-PCR were used to compare the panel of american tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL) isolates obtained from lesions of patients with rare clinical manifestations of the disease and typical lesions. All of the 34 samples analyzed by MLEE demonstrated similar electromorphic profiles with Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis reference strain. Through the RAPD analysis, nine genetic profiles (genotypes) were identified. LSSP-PCR corroborates the initial screening and phenetic analysis has grouped the isolates into two major clusters comprising the nine different genotypes. Prevalent genotype defined as LbmtDNAgen1 was detected in the largest number of isolates. There was no association between genotypes and clinical symptoms. However, two different genotypes could be identified in the initial (LbmtDNAGen9) and reactivated lesion (LbmtDNAGen3) of the same patient. Our results support the idea of a less pronounced genotypic diversity among L (V.) braziliensis circulating in the State of Rio de Janeiro and demonstrate the useful application of these molecular markers in genetics variability studies. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available