4.5 Article

A Comparison of 3 Digital Image Correlation Techniques on Necessarily Suboptimal Random Patterns Recorded By X-Ray

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages 467-477

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-010-9444-1

Keywords

Image correlation; X-ray; Propellant; Deformation; Fragment attack

Funding

  1. NNSA of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC52-06NA25396]
  2. Joint DoD/DoE Munitions Technology Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dynamic x-rays have been used to follow the deformation ahead of a steel ball fired into a mock-up of a generic cylindrical rocket motor. The impact was arranged to intersect a sparse lead powder layer within the mock explosive that created a random speckle pattern on x-ray film. Three different digital image correlation programs are compared to examine any sensitivity to the sub-optimal speckle pattern produced by the lead powder. An identical output data reduction method was used in all cases to aid comparison. All three correlation methods were able analyze the deformation, but all had intricacies that would require more detailed optimization of the data reduction in order to fully exploit the technique. Quantitative analysis showed that the three methods agreed closely in estimations of rigid body displacements between a pair of representative x-ray images. It was discovered that the deformation caused by the ball impact was highly localized and the useful data available about the deformation pattern was sparse. This limits the applicability of this technique to this specific application. Extensive cracking was not observed that would have aided the development of computer-based models for prediction of such impact events. The x-ray technique was however excellent for determining the ball position as a function of time after impact.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available