4.6 Article

Influence of narrowband UVB phototherapy on vitamin D and folate status

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages E67-E72

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.00987.x

Keywords

folate; narrowband UVB; phototherapy; psoriasis; vitamin D

Categories

Funding

  1. The Research Council of Norway
  2. The Research Foundation of The Norwegian Radiumhospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>Background: A variety of studies have shown beneficial effects of different types of phototherapy in skin disorders. Such therapy leads to enhanced cutaneous vitamin D synthesis, which may be one of the mechanisms of action. Furthermore, another nutrient, folate, can probably also be influenced by UV radiation. Objective: The aim of our study was to investigate the influence of low-dose narrowband UVB (nUVB) phototherapy of patients with psoriasis, atopic eczema and other skin disorders on serum levels of 25(OH) vitamin D (the serum marker for vitamin D status) and on serum and erythrocyte-folate. Methods: 25(OH) vitamin D (25(OH)D), serum and erythrocyte-folate levels were measured before and after low-dose nUVB (TL-01 tubes) phototherapy of these patients. The spectrum of the TL-01 tube was compared with the solar spectrum, and the efficiency spectra of vitamin D photosynthesis were calculated. Results: For patients with a high initial 25(OH)D serum level (> 80 nmol/l), no significant (P = 0.36) increase in 25(OH)D levels was seen, in contrast to patients with a low initial level (< 80 nmol/l) where a significant increase (P < 0.001) was observed. The increase was 30-60%, depending on the UVB dose (2.35-13.4 J/cm2). No significant nUVB-effect was found on the erythrocyte and serum-folate level. Conclusion: Low-dose nUVB treatment gives a significant increase (P < 0.001) of the vitamin D status in persons with low initial levels of 25(OH)D, but no effect on the folate level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available