4.6 Article

Mutationally activated K-ras 4A and 4B both mediate lung carcinogenesis

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
Volume 314, Issue 5, Pages 1105-1114

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.11.004

Keywords

K-ras 4A; K-ras 4B; lung cancer; N-methyl-N-nitrosourea; mutation; Erk; Akt

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK [C5/A4318] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To examine the roles of endogenous K-ras 4A and K-ras 4B splice variants in tumorigenesis, murine lung carcinogenesis was induced by N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU), which causes a K-ras mutation (G12D) that jointly affects both isoforms. Compared with age-matched K-raS(tmA4A/-) mice (where tumours can express mutationally activated K-ras 4B only), tumour number and size were significantly higher in K-ras(+/-) mice (where tumours can also express mutationally activated K-ras 4A), and significantly lower in K-TaStm Delta 4A/tm Delta 4A mice (where tumours can express both wild-type and activated K-ras 4B). MNU induced significantly more, and larger, tumours in wild-type than K-ras(tm Delta 4A/tm Delta 4A) mice which differ in that only tumours in wild-type mice can express wild-type and activated K-ras 4A. Lung tumours in all genotypes were predominantly papillary adenomas, and tumours from K-ras(+/-) and K-ras(tm Delta 4A/-) mice exhibited phospho-Erk1/2 and phospho-Akt staining. Hence (1) mutationally activated K-ras 4B is sufficient to activate the Raf/MEK/ERK(MAPK) and P13-K/Akt pathways, and initiate lung tumorigenesis, (2) when expressed with activated K-ras 4B, mutationally activated K-ras 4A further promotes lung tumour formation and growth (both in the presence and absence of its wild-type isoform) but does not affect either tumour pathology or progression, and (3) wild-type K-ras 4B, either directly or indirectly, reduces tumour number and size. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available