4.4 Article

Investigation of toxicological effects of Shuanghuanglian injection in Beagle dogs by metabonomic and traditional approaches

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 235, Issue 11, Pages 1356-1364

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1258/ebm.2010.009390

Keywords

Shuanghuanglian injection; toxicity; hemolysis; metabonomic

Funding

  1. Program of Key Technology Research for Drug Safety Evaluation [2006BAI14B06]
  2. Key Innovative Drug Development Program [2008ZX09305-008]
  3. National 863 project [2006AA03Z356]]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, clinical biochemistry, hematology, histopathology and H-1 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy-based metabonomic approaches were applied to investigate the toxicological effects of Shuanghuanglian (SHL) injection after intravenous administration (dosed at 4, 12 and 36 mL stock/kg) in Beagle dogs for 30 d. Decreases in red blood cells, hemoglobin, mean cell volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration were observed in the high-dose group. Elevated reticulocytes, total bilirubin and direct bilirubin were also observed in this group. Moreover, significant hemosiderosis and Prussian blue positivity were detected in the liver, spleen and kidney from high-dose group animals, and transmission electron microscopy examination revealed an appreciable number of acanthrocytes in the liver. These results collectively indicate that SHL injection has the potential to cause hemolytic anemia. Metabonomic analysis showed increases in serum lactate, choline and phosphocholine but a decrease in taurine in treated groups and these findings may underlie the toxicological mechanism of SHL injection. In summary, SHL injection shows hemolytic effects in Beagle dogs; moreover, serum choline and phosphocholine as well as lactate and taurine may be the biomarkers for hemolytic anemia induced by SHL injection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available