4.6 Article

Evaluation of rockfish conservation area networks in the United States and Canada relative to the dispersal distance for black rockfish (Sebastes melanops)

Journal

EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 238-259

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eva.12115

Keywords

conservation genetics; effective population size; fisheries management; marine protected areas; MIGRATE; ONeSAMP; population genetics - empirical; reserve design

Funding

  1. Parks Canada
  2. PADI Foundation
  3. NSERC PGSD
  4. NSERC Strategic Grant
  5. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
  6. UBC STAR Fellowship
  7. Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre scholarships

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Marine reserves networks are implemented as a way to mitigate the impact of fishing on marine ecosystems. Theory suggests that a reserve network will function synergistically when connected by dispersal, but the scale of dispersal is often unknown. On the Pacific coast of the United States and Canada, both countries have recently implemented a number of rockfish conservation areas (RCAs) to protect exploited rockfish species, but no study has evaluated the connectivity within networks in each country or between the two countries. We used isolation-by-distance theory to estimate the scale of dispersal from microsatellite data in the black rockfish, Sebastes melanops, and compared this estimate with the distance between RCAs that would protect this species. Within each country, we found that the distance between RCAs was generally within the confidence intervals of mean dispersal per generation. The distance between these two RCA networks, however, was greater than the average dispersal per generation. The data were also consistent with a genetic break between southern Oregon and central Oregon. We discuss whether additional nearshore RCAs in southern Oregon and Washington would help promote connectivity between RCA's for shallow-water rockfishes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available