Journal
EVOLUTION
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages 1088-1098Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01173.x
Keywords
Adaptation; evolutionary genomics; genetic variation; genome theory; sex; variation
Categories
Funding
- Natural Sciences & Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
- Susan G. Komen Cancer Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
For over a century, the paradigm has been that sex invariably increases genetic variation, despite many renowned biologists asserting that sex decreases most genetic variation. Sex is usually perceived as the source of additive genetic variance that drives eukaryotic evolution vis-a-vis adaptation and Fisher's fundamental theorem. However, evidence for sex decreasing genetic variation appears in ecology, paleontology, population genetics, and cancer biology. The common thread among many of these disciplines is that sex acts like a coarse filter, weeding out major changes, such as chromosomal rearrangements (that are almost always deleterious), but letting minor variation, such as changes at the nucleotide or gene level (that are often neutral), flow through the sexual sieve. Sex acts as a constraint on genomic and epigenetic variation, thereby limiting adaptive evolution. The diverse reasons for sex reducing genetic variation (especially at the genome level) and slowing down evolution may provide a sufficient benefit to offset the famed costs of sex.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available