4.3 Article

Identification and antagonistic activity of endophytic bacterial strain Paenibacillus sp 5 L8 isolated from the seeds of maize (Zea mays L., Jingke 968)

Journal

ANNALS OF MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages 653-660

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1007/s13213-015-1150-x

Keywords

Maize Jingke 968; Endophytes; Paenibacillus sp 5 L8; Identification; Antagonistic activity

Funding

  1. Beijing Nova Program [Z141105001814095]
  2. Beijing Nova Interdisciplinary Cooperational Program [Z1511000003150150]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31300008]
  4. Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015 M570969]
  5. Fund of National Infrastructure of Microbial Resources [NIMR2015-4]
  6. Scientific and Technological Development Project of the China National Research Institute of Food and Fermentation Industries [2012KJFZ-BS-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Endophytes are related to the health and growth of plants. In this study, the endophytic bacterial strain Paenibacillus sp. 5 L8 was isolated from the seeds of maize (Zea mays L., Jingke 968). Strain 5 L8 was identified as Paenibacillus polymyxa by polyphasic taxonomy based on morphological and physiological methods, and 16S rRNA gene phylogenetic analysis. Via antagonistic testing against the common plant pathogens Fusarium graminearum, Bipolaris maydis, Bipolaris sorokiniana, Cochliobolus heterostrophus, Aspergillus aculeatus, Phomopsis chimonanthi and Verticillium dahliae, strain 5 L8 showed comprehensive and good antagonistic activity. The draft genome of Paenibacillus sp. 5 L8 was sequenced by Illumina HiSeq 2000, and three coding sequences (CDSs) for the glucanase gene were annotated and correlated to antagonistic activity. Using specific primers to amplify the biocontrol gene in the glucanase family, the beta-1,3-1,4-glucanase gene (gluB) was found. This study supplies a basis for further study of industrial research and application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available