Journal
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 253-279Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbp014
Keywords
biotechnology; Bt cotton; resistance; natural refuge crops; China; C15; Q16; Q28
Categories
Funding
- Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA)
- International Development Research Center [103783-001]
- National Science Foundation of China [70873137, 70333001]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In this study we discuss why planting non-Bacillus thuringiensis (non-Bt) cotton as a refuge crop in China (and other developing countries) may not be economically optimal. To show this, we develop a bioeconomic model to run simulations that will help find the optimal strategies for managing the joint resistance of pests to the Bt toxin and conventional pesticides. We show that the approach of not requiring non-Bt cotton as a refuge is defensible given initial conditions and parameters calibrated to China's cotton production environment. Of special importance is the existence of natural refuge crops. The nature of transaction costs associated with implementing a refuge policy is also considered.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available