The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography

CT colonography without cathartic preparation: positive predictive value and patient experience in clinical practice

(2012) Carmen Zueco Zueco et al.   EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY

Editorial: Consensus Guidelines: Method or Madness?

(2011) Nimish Vakil   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY

Non-laxative CT colonography with barium-based faecal tagging: is additional phosphate enema beneficial and well tolerated?

(2011) W Davis et al.   BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY

CT colonography: Who attends training? A survey of participants at educational workshops

(2011) D. Boone et al.   CLINICAL RADIOLOGY

Accuracy of computed tomographic colonography in a nationwide multicentre trial, and its relation to radiologist expertise

(2011) D. Heresbach et al.   GUT

Konsensus-Statement der Österreichischen Röntgengesellschaft, der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie und der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie zur CT-Kolonografie („Virtuelle Koloskopie”)

(2011) T. Mang et al.   ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN

Patients’ preferences about follow-up of medium size polyps detected at screening CT colonography

(2010) Emanuele Neri et al.   ABDOMINAL IMAGING

Performing an additional decubitus series at CT colonography

(2010) Christopher M. Buchach et al.   ABDOMINAL IMAGING

Can Radiologist Training and Testing Ensure High Performance in CT Colonography? Lessons From the National CT Colonography Trial

(2010) Joel G. Fletcher et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY

Low-Fiber Diet in Limited Bowel Preparation for CT Colonography: Influence on Image Quality and Patient Acceptance

(2010) Marjolein H. Liedenbaum et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY

CT colonography standards

(2010) D. Burling   CLINICAL RADIOLOGY

Reducing the oral contrast dose in CT colonography: evaluation of faecal tagging quality and patient acceptance

(2010) M.H. Liedenbaum et al.   CLINICAL RADIOLOGY

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography or fecal blood tests

(2010) Denis Heresbach et al.   EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and interpretation times for a standard and an advanced 3D visualisation technique in CT colonography

(2010) Thomas Mang et al.   EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY

Effect of Computer-aided Detection for CT Colonography in a Multireader, Multicase Trial

(2010) Abraham H. Dachman et al.   RADIOLOGY

Evaluation of a Standardized CT Colonography Training Program for Novice Readers

(2010) Marjolein H. Liedenbaum et al.   RADIOLOGY

Incremental Benefit of Computer-aided Detection when Used as a Second and Concurrent Reader of CT Colonographic Data: Multiobserver Study

(2010) Steve Halligan et al.   RADIOLOGY

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on Colorectal Cancer Screening

(2010) Judy Yee et al.   Journal of the American College of Radiology

Comparison of 2D and 3D Views for Evaluation of Flat Lesions in CT Colonography

(2009) Antonella Lostumbo et al.   ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY

Editorial: CTC Interpretation by Gastroenterologists: Feasible but Largely Impractical, Undesirable and Misguided

(2009) Perry J Pickhardt   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY

Comparison of Polyp Size and Volume at CT Colonography: Implications for Follow-Up CT Colonography

(2009) Emily Bethea et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY

Three-day regimen improves faecal tagging for minimal preparation CT examination of the colon

(2009) A SLATER et al.   BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY

Computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader using perspective filet view at CT colonography: effect on performance of inexperienced readers

(2009) V.A. Fisichella et al.   CLINICAL RADIOLOGY

Comparison of three different iodine-based bowel regimens for CT colonography

(2009) Delia Campanella et al.   EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY

CT colonography with minimal bowel preparation: evaluation of tagging quality, patient acceptance and diagnostic accuracy in two iodine-based preparation schemes

(2009) Marjolein H. Liedenbaum et al.   EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY

Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Colonography for the Detection of Advanced Neoplasia in Individuals at Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer

(2009) Daniele Regge   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

Impact of Computer-aided Detection on the Cost-effectiveness of CT Colonography

(2009) Daniele Regge et al.   RADIOLOGY

ACR Colon Cancer Committee White Paper: Status of CT Colonography 2009

(2009) Elizabeth G. McFarland et al.   Journal of the American College of Radiology

Re: Colonic perforation during screening CT colonography using automated CO2 insufflation in an asymptomatic adult

(2008) Emanuele Neri et al.   ABDOMINAL IMAGING

CT colonography: same-day tagging regimen with iodixanol and reduced cathartic preparation

(2008) Emanuele Neri et al.   ABDOMINAL IMAGING

Manual and Automated Polyp Measurement

(2008) Jun Yong Jeong et al.   ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY

Automated Carbon Dioxide Insufflation for CT Colonography: Effectiveness of Colonic Distention in Cancer Patients with Severe Luminal Narrowing

(2008) So Yeon Kim et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY

Clinical Management of Small (6- to 9-mm) Polyps Detected at Screening CT Colonography: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

(2008) Perry J. Pickhardt et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY

Computer-aided detection for CT colonography: incremental benefit of observer training

(2008) S A TAYLOR et al.   BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY

Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology

(2008) B. Levin et al.   CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS

Comparison of axial, coronal, and primary 3D review in MDCT colonography for the detection of small polyps: A phantom study

(2008) Thomas Mang et al.   EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY

Does a computer-aided detection algorithm in a second read paradigm enhance the performance of experienced computed tomography colonography readers in a population of increased risk?

(2008) Ayso H. de Vries et al.   EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY

Radiation dose in CT colonography–trends in time and differences between daily practice and screening protocols

(2008) M. H. Liedenbaum et al.   EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY

Measurement of colonic polyps by radiologists and endoscopists: Who is most accurate?

(2008) S. Punwani et al.   EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY

Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population

(2008) A Graser et al.   GUT

Accuracy of CT Colonography for Detection of Large Adenomas and Cancers

(2008) C. Daniel Johnson et al.   NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

CT Colonography with Computer-aided Detection as a Second Reader: Observer Performance Study

(2008) Nicholas Petrick et al.   RADIOLOGY

Linear Polyp Measurement at CT Colonography: 3D Endoluminal Measurement with Optimized Surface-rendering Threshold Value and Automated Measurement

(2007) Seong Ho Park et al.   RADIOLOGY

CT Colonography: Investigation of the Optimum Reader Paradigm by Using Computer-aided Detection Software

(2007) Stuart A. Taylor et al.   RADIOLOGY