4.7 Article

Quantification of hydroxyl group in polymers containing trace water by 19F NMR spectroscopy

Journal

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 228-234

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.09.019

Keywords

Hydroxyl value; 4-Fluorophenyl isocyanate; F-19 NMR spectroscopy; Hydroxyl functional group; Polyester diol; PEG

Funding

  1. Imam Hossein University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A convenient, reliable and efficient method for characterizing hydroxyl functional group of hydroxyl containing polymers (synthetic and commercial) is discussed. It involves an in situ derivatization of hydroxyl group with a reactive reagent, 4-fluorophenyl isocyanate, in an NMR tube followed by integration of the unique F-19 resonance contributed to the product vs. that of alpha,alpha,alpha-trifluorotoluene as an internal standard in the F-19 NMR spectra. The method introduces distinct advantages over many other methods (e.g. titration, etc.). The spectra of the products appear in a manner that an explicit and accurate resolution can be achieved for the products, namely urethane, and spontaneously formed urea (due. to the reaction of trace water and isocyanate in excess amount). The reliability of the quantification was examined using a mixture of hydroxyl containing sample with known hydroxyl values including 1-butanol (containing primary hydroxyl) and 2-propanol (containing secondary hydroxyl). Quantification of hydroxyl group was then exercised for a broad range of high molecular weight polymers, including synthetic poly(epsilon-caprolactones) and polyester diols and commercial PEGs and the resulting data were compared with the standard ASTM method. In contrast to titration technique, this method can be performed quickly (about 15 min), by a small amount of sample (about 20 mg) as well as using routine NMR spectroscopic techniques. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available