4.7 Article

Electrospun non-woven mats from stereocomplex between high molar mass poly(L-lactide) and poly(D-lactide)-block-poly(butylene succinate) copoly(ester urethane)s

Journal

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
Volume 48, Issue 12, Pages 1965-1975

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.09.013

Keywords

Electrospinning; Stereocomplex; Polylactide; Poly(butylene succinate); Poly(ester urethane)

Funding

  1. National Fund of Scientific Research [DO 02-237/2008]
  2. Region Wallonne
  3. European Commission
  4. FNRS-FRFC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By applying electrospinning new fibrous materials from a stereocomplex formed between a high molar mass poly(L-lactide) (HPLLA) and a copoly(ester urethane) (CPEU) based on poly(D-lactide) (PDIA) and poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) blocks (PDLA-b-PBS) were prepared. The stereocomplex formation was evaluated by means of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses. In contrast to electrospun mats of HPLLA and HPLLA/PDLA-OH in which the polymers were in the amorphous state, it was found that the presence of PBS allowed the formation of a crystalline phase in the fibrous materials from HPLLA/PDLA-b-PBS. Annealing at 100 degrees C for 8 h enabled reorganization of the polymer segments within the fibers and the appearance for all of the samples of crystalline diffractions in the XRD patterns. A melting temperature of about 200 degrees C was registered in the DSC thermograms of pristine and annealed mats from HPLLA/PDLA-OH and HPLLA/PDLA-b-PBS; evidence for stereocomplex formation. It was shown that besides stereocomplex crystallites PBS and PLA crystallites existed as well when using CPEUs with a higher PBS content. The obtained data from the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed that the thermal stability of the stereocomplex-based fibrous materials depended on the PBS content. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available