4.7 Article

Gravitino and Polonyi production in supergravity

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 78, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6111-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japanese Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS) [26400252]
  2. Competitiveness Enhancement Program of Tomsk Polytechnic University in Russia
  3. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI Initiative), MEXT, Japan
  4. FAPESP [2016/01343-7]
  5. Russian Science Foundation
  6. MEPhI Academic Excellence Project [02.a03.21.0005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study production of gravitino and Polonyi particles in the minimal Starobinsky-Polonyi N = 1 supergravity with inflaton belonging to a massive vector super-multiplet. Our model has only one free parameter given by the scale of spontaneous SUSY breaking triggered by Polonyi chiral superfield. The vector supermultiplet generically enters the action non-minimally, via an arbitrary real function. This function is chosen to generate the inflaton scalar potential of the Starobinsky model. Our supergravity model can be reformulated as an abelian supersymmetric gauge theory with the vector gauge superfield coupled to two (Higgs and Polonyi) chiral superfields interacting with supergravity, where the U(1) gauge symmetry is spontaneously broken. We find that Polonyi and gravitino particles are efficiently produced during inflation, and estimate their masses and the reheating temperature. After inflation, perturbative decay of inflaton also produces Polonyi particles that rapidly decay into gravitinos. As a result, a coherent picture of inflation and dark matter emerges, where the abundance of produced gravitinos after inflation fits the CMB constraints as a Super Heavy Dark Matter (SHDM) candidate. Our scenario avoids the notorous gravitino and Polonyi problems with the Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) and DM overproduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available