4.5 Article

Ondansetron augmentation in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder who are inadequate responders to serotonin reuptake inhibitors: Improvement with treatment and worsening following discontinuation

Journal

EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 375-380

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.12.003

Keywords

OCD; Low-dose ondansetron; Augmentation; 5-HT3

Funding

  1. Transcept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Object: The aim of this study was to evaluate low-dose ondansetron as an augmentation strategy in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) who do not adequately respond to serotonin reuptake inhibits (SRIs). Methods: Twenty-one OCD patients who had not responded adequately to an SRI received 12 weeks of single-blind ondansetron augmentation initiated at 0.25 mg BID for 2 weeks, and titrated to 0.5 mg BID for an additional 10 weeks. Patients were rated every two weeks using the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) and Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI). Treatment response was defined as an additional 25% reduction in YBOCS score from the score at the initiation of ondansetron augmentation, an end of treatment YBOCS score of <= 24 and a CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) score of <= 2. Upon completion of treatment course patients were followed for 4 weeks. Results: At week 12, twelve of the 21 (57%) patients were responders. The average reduction in the YBOCS score for the overall group was 27.2%. Responders had an average 44% YBOCS score reduction and 76.9% CGI-1 reduction. After discontinuation of ondansetron the YBOCS worsened an average of 15.5% in the entire sample and 38.3% in the responder subsample. No clinically meaningful side effects were reported. Conclusion: OCD patients who do not adequately respond to an SRI may benefit from augmentation with a low-dose of ondansetron. This may provide an alternative approach to augmentation with atypical antipsychotic agents, with a more favorable safety profile. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. and ECNR All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available