4.5 Article

Indocyanine Green Angiography for Intra-operative Assessment in Vascular Surgery

Journal

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.12.030

Keywords

Indocyanine green angiography; HyperEye Medical System; Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Arteriosclerosis obliterans; Transit-time flowmetry; Intestinal ischaemia; Ischaemic colitis

Funding

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23300191] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Indocyanine green (ICG) angiography is used for the intra-operative assessment of the graft vessel in coronary artery bypass grafting to enable immediate revision if necessary. We report the feasibility and implications of an ICG colour imaging system, HyperEye Medical System (HEMS), in surgeries for arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) which carry risk of mesenteric ischaemia. Methods: HEMS ICG angiography was used for the intra-operative assessment of 12 ASO patients and 10 AAA patients. Results: In the ASO patients, HEMS angiography enabled visualisation of the graft and native artery. The fluorescent lucent region in the artery distal to the anastomosis was shown in -1 of 12 ASO patients. There was a 3-s time lag in the increase of intensity between the proximal artery and distal stenotic region. In AAA patients, HEMS angiography clearly showed the perfusion in the mesenteric arteries and intestinal wall as opaque. One AAA patient had segmental ischaemia due to thromboembolism and another one had diffuse ischaemia due to systemic malperfusion. The ischaemic region of the intestine was visualised as a fluorescent lucent area by HEMS angiography. Conclusion: HEMS angiography can accurately assess peripheral arterial perfusion in surgical cases with ASO and AAA. (C) 2012 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available