4.6 Article

Effects of temperature and life stage on the fatty acid composition of Collembola

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 213-219

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.09.003

Keywords

fatty acids; temperature; neutral lipids; trophic biomarker; fungi; Collembola

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fatty acid (FA) analysis is used as a promising tool to investigate trophic interactions in soil food webs. The FA profile of neutral lipids in consumers is affected by the diet, and the occurrence and amount of certain FAs can reflect feeding strategies. We investigated the lipid composition of the Collembola Folsomia candida, Heteromurus nitidus and Protaphorura fimata with the fungus Chaetomium globosum as food source. The impact of environmental temperature and life stage was assessed, with special respect to linoleic acid (18:2w6,9) as a marker FA for fungal feeding. In all Collembola species the ratio of C16/C18 in neutral lipid fatty acids (NLFAs) increased with decreasing temperature. In the NLFAs of F. candida and H. nitidus the Unsaturation Index and the amount of 18:2w6,9 decreased with temperature, whereas in P. fimata effects were the opposite. The composition of phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs) differed between species, but was little affected by temperature. The degree of unsaturation in NLFAs increased with the age of Collembola, mainly due to higher amounts of 18:2w6,9 and a lower proportion of 18:1w9. The biomarker linoleic acid represented over 20% of FAs in all fungal feeding Collembola. Despite considerable influence of temperature and life stage on its proportion, the amount was always higher than in individuals reared on other diets. This suggests that linoleic acid can serve as marker for fungal feeding independent of such physiological variations in Collembola. (c) 2007 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available