4.6 Article

The influence of amorphization methods on the apparent solubility and dissolution rate of tadalafil

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 132-140

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2014.05.026

Keywords

Amorphous drugs; Tadalafil; Apparent solubility; Dissolution rate; Precipitation from solution

Funding

  1. National Science Centre [DEC-2012/05/B/1127NZ7/03233]
  2. Synthesis and Solid State Pharmaceuticals Centre (SSPC) - Science Foundation Ireland [12/RC/2275]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study for the first time investigates the solubility and dissolution rate of amorphous tadalafil (Td) - a poorly water soluble chemical compound which is commonly used for treating the erectile dysfunction. To convert the crystalline form of Td drug to its amorphous counterpart we have employed most of the commercially available amorphization techniques i.e. vitrification, cryogenic grinding, ball milling, spray drying, freeze drying and antisolvent precipitation. Among the mentioned methods only quenched cooling of the molten sample was found to be an inappropriate method of Td amorphization. This is due to the thermal decomposition of Td above 200 degrees C, as proved by the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Disordered character of all examined samples was confirmed using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray powder diffraction (PXRD). In the case of most amorphous powders, the largest 3-fold increase of apparent solubility was observed after 5 min, indicating their fast recrystallization in water. On the other hand, the partially amorphous precipitate of Td and hypromellose enhanced the solubility of Td approximately 14 times, as compared with a crystalline substance, which remained constant for half an hour. Finally, disk intrinsic dissolution rate (DIDR) of amorphous forms of Td was also examined. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available