4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Relationships between protein and mineral during enamel development in normal and genetically altered mice

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES
Volume 119, Issue -, Pages 125-135

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00871.x

Keywords

ameloblastin; enamelin; KLK4; mineral; matrix metalloproteinase 20 (MMP20)

Funding

  1. CIHR Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [R56 DE016276, DE016276, R01 DE019775, R01 DE016276, R01 DE016276-05, DE019775, R01 DE011301, R56 DE011301, DE011301, R01 DE019775-04, R29 DE011301] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the amounts of volatiles (mostly protein) and mineral present in developing incisor enamel in normal mice and in those genetically engineered for absence of intact enamelin, ameloblastin, matrix metalloproteinase 20 (MMP20) or kallikrein-related peptidase 4 (KLK4). Data indicated that all mice showed peaks in the gross weight of volatiles and a similar weight of mineral at locations on incisors normally associated with early maturation. Thereafter, the content of volatiles on normal incisors declined rapidly by as much as 62%, but not by 100%, over 2 mm, accompanied by increases of similar to threefold in mineral weights. Enamelin heterozygous mice (lower incisors) showed a decrease in volatile content across the maturation stage, yet mineral failed to increase significantly. Mmp20 null mice showed no significant loss of volatiles from maturing enamel, yet the amount of mineral increased. Klk4 null mice showed normal mineral acquisition up to early maturation, but the input of new volatiles in mid to late maturation caused the final mineralization to slow below normal levels. These results suggest that it is not only the amount of protein but also the nature or type of protein or fragments present in the local crystallite environment that affects their volumetric expansion as they mature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available