4.7 Article

Joint optimization of level of repair analysis and spare parts stocks

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 222, Issue 3, Pages 474-483

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.045

Keywords

Inventory; Maintenance; Level of repair analysis

Funding

  1. Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation
  2. Lloyd's Register Educational Trust, an independent charity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the field of after sales service logistics for capital goods, generally, METRIC type methods are used to decide where to stock spare parts in a multi-echelon repair network such that a target availability of the capital goods is achieved. These methods generate a trade-off curve of spares investment costs versus backorders. Backorders of spare parts lead to unavailability of the capital goods. Inputs in the spare parts stocking problem are decisions on (1) which components to repair upon failure and which to discard, and (2) at which locations in the repair network to perform the repairs and discards. The level of repair analysis (LORA) can be used to make such decisions in conjunction with the decisions (3) at which locations to deploy resources, such as test equipment that are required to repair, discard, or move components. Since these decisions significantly impact the spare parts investment costs, we propose to solve the LORA and spare parts stocking problems jointly. We design an algorithm that finds efficient solutions. In order for the algorithm to be exact and because of its computational complexity, we restrict ourselves to two-echelon, single-indenture problems. In a computational experiment, we show that solving the joint problem is worthwhile, since we achieve a cost reduction of over 43% at maximum (5.1% on average) compared with using a sequential approach of first solving a LORA and then the spare parts stocking problem. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available