4.5 Article

Patient expectations and preferences for follow-up after treatment for lung cancer: A pilot study

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 221-225

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2010.01.002

Keywords

Lung cancer; Follow-up; Models of care; Nurse-led services

Funding

  1. Western and Central Melbourne Integrated Cancer Service

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: There is no robust evidence to indicate the most appropriate models of follow-up care for patients who have completed treatment for lung cancer. This pilot study aimed to assess expectations and preferences for follow-up care in a sample of patients who had completed treatment for lung cancer. Method: Thirty-one patients who had completed treatment for primary lung cancer were recruited. A 13 item self-report survey was developed to elicit patient's preferences and expectations for follow-up. Participants completed the developed survey and clinical and demographic variables were collected. Results: Factors scored as extremely important by over 80% of respondents focused on care coordination: Being able to see the same doctor or health care professional at each visit (24/83%); Knowing which doctor or nurse to contact if queries arise between follow-up appointments (23/82%); and Knowing the patient can book an appointment or contact a health care professional involved in their care regarding health concerns between visits (25/89%). Patients were supportive of nurse-led follow-up when offered in the context of a model of shared care (21/78%). Conclusion: This study offers new insight into the expectations and preferences for follow-up of patients with lung cancer, with participants indicated preference for intensive follow-up after the completion of treatment. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available