4.3 Article

Placental abruption: risk factors, management and maternal-fetal prognosis. Cohort study over 10 years

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.026

Keywords

Placental abruption; Maternal morbidity; Perinatal mortality; Preeclampsia; Preterm PROM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To describe maternal and fetal risk factors, diagnosis, management and prognosis of placental abruption (PA). Study design: A retrospective cohort study between January 2003 and December 2012 within the three maternity units of a French university hospital. We included 55,926 deliveries after 24 weeks' gestation including 247 cases of PA (0.4%). We conducted univariate analyses to compare PA and control groups. Multivariate models were constructed in order to study PA risk factors and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Results: Independent risk factors for PA were preterm premature rupture of membranes (OR 9.5; 95% CI 16.9-13.1]), gestational hypertension (OR 7.4; 95% CI [5.1-10.8]), preeclampsia (OR 2.9; 95% CI 11.9-4.6]) and major multiparity (OR 1.6; 95% CI [1.1-2.41). The classic clinical triad associating metrorrhagia, uterine hypertonia and abdominopelvic pains was present in only 9.7% of cases. Caesarean section rate was 90.3% with 51.8% being performed under general anesthesia. There was no case of maternal death, but maternal morbidity was considerable, with 7.7% of coagulation disorders and 16.6% of transfusion. After adjustment for the gestational age, we found an increased risk for pH <= 7.0 (OR 14.9; 95% CI [9.2-23.9]) and neonatal resuscitation (OR 4.6; 95% CI [3.1-6.8]). Perinatal mortality was 15.8%, including 78% of fetal deaths. Conclusions: Appropriate multidisciplinary management can limit maternal morbidity and mortality but perinatal mortality, which occurs essentially in utero, remains high. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available