4.5 Article

The eye contact effect in request and emblematic hand gestures

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 841-851

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12428

Keywords

communicative gestures; social gaze; functional magnetic resonance imaging; social intention; gesture representation

Categories

Funding

  1. Istituto Tecnologie Avanzate Biomediche (ITAB), Fondazione Universita 'G. d'Annunzio', Chieti, Italy
  2. Ministero Italiano Universita e Ricerca (MIUR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Request and emblematic gestures, despite being both communicative gestures, do differ in terms of social valence. Indeed, only the former are used to initiate/maintain/terminate an actual interaction. If such a difference is at stake, a relevant social cue, i.e. eye contact, should have different impacts on the neuronal underpinnings of the two types of gesture. We measured blood oxygen level-dependent signals, using functional magnetic resonance imaging, while participants watched videos of an actor, either blindfolded or not, performing emblems, request gestures, or meaningless control movements. A left-lateralized network was more activated by both types of communicative gestures than by meaningless movements, regardless of the accessibility of the actor's eyes. Strikingly, when eye contact was taken into account as a factor, a right-lateralized network was more strongly activated by emblematic gestures performed by the non-blindfolded actor than by those performed by the blindfolded actor. Such modulation possibly reflects the integration of information conveyed by the eyes with the representation of emblems. Conversely, a wider right-lateralized network was more strongly activated by request gestures performed by the blindfolded than by those performed by the non-blindfolded actor. This probably reflects the effect of the conflict between the observed action and its associated contextual information, in which relevant social cues are missing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available