4.2 Article

Diamond oxidation at atmospheric pressure: development of surface features and the effect of oxygen fugacity

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MINERALOGY
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 623-635

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.1127/0935-1221/2009/0021-1929

Keywords

diamond resorption; etch forms; kinetics; experiments; oxygen fugacity; kimberlites; diamond preservation; relative oxidation rates

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The oxidation of cubic diamond plates was experimentally investigated at 100 kPa, at 1000, 1050 and 1100 degrees C and at variable oxygen fugacity (fO(2)) to evaluate the effect of fO(2) on diamond preservation and to examine the development of secondary diamond morphology. The diamond oxidation rate was determined from weight and size changes of the diamonds and shows a similar fO(2)-dependence at three temperatures (7): Ln V = 0.57 log fO(2) + T-term, where V is diamond oxidation rate and T-term is the term dependent on temperature. The derived relationship can be used to evaluate the significance of the earlier established variations in the redox state in several EKATI mine property kimberlites, N.W.T., Canada. The surfaces of etched diamonds from the experiments were studied using high-resolution field emission scanning electron microscopy. At 100 kPa the shape, orientation and size of the etch pits have no consistent correlation with temperature, fO(2) and the reaction rates. Increase in the CO2-content of the reacting gas results in an evolution from irregular cavities to pits formed by the development of (100) faces and further to more regular forms with (111) faces. These results agree with high pressure data and suggest that the features developed on oxidized diamonds are determined by variations in the reaction rates in different directions of the diamond lattice, which are dictated by the molecular composition of the reacting fluid (or gas). A high CO2 content favours fast oxidation rates in the [111] direction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available