4.7 Article

Extending pK(a) prediction accuracy: High-throughput pK(a) measurements to understand pK(a) modulation of new chemical series

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 45, Issue 9, Pages 4270-4279

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.06.026

Keywords

pK(a) Prediction; pK(a) Measurement; MoK alpha; Ionization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have recently developed a tool. MoKa, to predict the pK(a) of organic compounds using a large dataset of over 26,500 literature pK(a) values as a training set. However, predicting accurately pK(a) (<0.5 pH units) remains challenging for novel series, and this can be a drawback in the optimization of activity and ADME properties of lead compounds. To address this issue it is important to expand our knowledge of pK(a) determinants, therefore we have conducted high-throughput pK(a) measurements by using Spectral Gradient Analysis (SGA) on novel series of compounds selected from vendor databases. Here we report our findings on the effect of specific chemical groups and steric constraints on the pK(a) of common functionalities in medicinal chemistry, such as amines, sulfonamides, and amides. Furthermore, we report the pK(a) of ionizable groups that were not well represented in the database of literature pK(a) of MoK alpha, such as hydrazide derivatives. These findings helped us to enhance MoK alpha, which is here benchmarked on a set of experimental PKa values from the Roche in-house library (N = 5581; RMSE = 1.09; R2 = 0.82). The accuracy of the predictions was greatly improved (RMSE = 0.49, R2 = 0.96) after training the software by using the automated tool Kibitzer with 6226 PKa values taken from a different set of Roche compounds appropriately selected, and this demonstrates the value of using high-throughput pK(a) measurements to expand the training set of PKa values used by the software MoK alpha. (C) 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available