4.4 Article

Treatment allocation in hepatocellular carcinoma: Assessment of the BCLC algorithm

Journal

ANNALS OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 82-90

Publisher

ELSEVIER ESPANA
DOI: 10.5604/16652681.1184233

Keywords

Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; Bern Clinic Liver Cancer; Performance status

Funding

  1. Swiss Foundation against Liver Cancer
  2. Philanthropic Committee of the Firmenich Family
  3. Bern League against Cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aims. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system is the algorithm most widely used to manage patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to investigate the extent to which the BCLC recommendations,effectively guide clinical practice and assess the reasons for any deviation from the recommendations. Material and methods. The first-line treatments assigned to patients, included in the prospective,Bern. HCC cohort were analyzed. Results. Among 223 patients included in the cohort, 116 were not treated according to the BCLC algorithm. Eighty percent of the patients in BCLC stage 0 (very-early HCC) and 60% of the patients in BCLC stage A (early HCC) received recommended curative treatment. Only 29% Of the BCLC stage B patients (intermediate HCC) and 33% of the BCLC Stage C patients (advanced HCC) were treated according to the algorithm Eighty-nine percent of the BCLC stage D patients (terminal HCC) were treated with best supportive care, as recommended. In 98 patients (44%) the performance status was, disregarded in the stage assignment, Conclusion. The management in clinical practice frequently deviates from the BCLC recommendations. Most of the curative therapy options, which have Well-defined selection criteria, were allocated according to the recommendations, while the majority of, the palliative therapy options were assigned to patients with tumor Stages not aligned with the recommendations. The only parameter which is subjective in the algorithm, the performance status, is also the least respected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available