4.5 Article

The Nature of the Barrier to Phosphane Dissociation from Grubbs Olefin Metathesis Catalysts

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume -, Issue 9, Pages 1507-1516

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201100932

Keywords

Reaction mechanisms; Density functional calculations; Transition states; Solvent effects; Ruthenium

Funding

  1. Norwegian Research Council [177322/V30, 203379/I30]
  2. University of Bergen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By using cost-efficient density functional theory accounting for dispersion in combination with an implicit solvent model, for the first time it has been possible to reproduce activation Gibbs free energies for phosphane dissociation from the Grubbs ruthenium olefin metathesis precatalysts in solution with good accuracy (mean unsigned error compared to experiment <2.5 kcal mol1). The barrier is calculated to be in the range 17.825.7 kcal?mol1 for a set of nine catalysts, and is found to be located at intermediate RuP distances (ca. 4 angstrom). The agreement with the experimental activation parameters is gratifying and suggests that the calculations may give insight into these reactions and, in particular, offer resolution as to the individual components of the barriers. The forward (dissociation) barriers are much higher than the corresponding reaction free energies and the reverse reaction, phosphane binding, is associated with a significant barrier (13.215.6 kcal?mol1). The latter barrier mainly arises from loss of entropy and solutesolvent dispersion interactions for the two fragments prior to RuP bond formation. Moreover, the fact that the barrier to phosphane binding is so significant means that the reaction free energy of phosphane dissociation cannot be taken to be identical or similar to the forward barrier, as has occasionally been assumed in earlier studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available