4.5 Article

Half of the T-cell repertoire combinatorial diversity is genetically determined in humans and humanized mice

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 760-770

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201141798

Keywords

Humanized mice; ISEApeaks; Multivariate score; T-cell repertoire; V-J rearrangements

Categories

Funding

  1. DIM-Stem Pole of the Region Ile-de-France
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  3. Association Francaise contre les Myopathies (AFM)
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche contre le SIDA (ANRS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In humanized mice, the T-cell repertoire is derived from genetically identical human progenitors in distinct animals. Thus, careful comparison of the T-cell repertoires of humanized mice with those of humans may reveal the contribution of genetic determinism on T-cell repertoire formation. Here, we performed a comprehensive assessment of the distribution of V-J combinations of the human beta chain of the T-cell receptor (hTRBV) in NOD.SCID.?c-/- (NSG) humanized mice. We observed that numerous V-J combinations were equally distributed in the thymus and in the periphery of humanized mice compared with human references. A global analysis of the data, comparing repertoire perturbation indices in humanized NSG mice and unrelated human PBMCs, reveals that 50% of the hTRBV families significantly overlapped. Using multivariate ranking and bootstrap analyses, we found that 18% of all possible V-J combinations contributed close to 50% of the expressed diversity, with significant over-representation of BV5-J1.1+1.2 and BV6-J1.1+1.2 rearrangements. Finally, comparison of CD3- and CD3+ thymocyte repertoires indicated that the observed V-J combination overlap was already present before TCR-MHC selection in the thymus. Altogether, our results show that half of the T-cell repertoire combinatorial diversity in humans is genetically determined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available