4.5 Article

P21-activated kinase 1 and 4 were associated with colorectal cancer metastasis and infiltration

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 196, Issue 1, Pages 130-135

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.02.035

Keywords

P21-activated kinase; Colorectal cancer; Gene expression; Recurrence; Metastasis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: P21-activated kinases (PAKs) are small guanosine triphosphate effectors that play critical roles in many fundamental cellular functions, including cytoskeletal reorganization and cell motility. PAKs are widely expressed in a variety of tissues and are often overexpressed in multiple cancer types. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between PAK1 and PAK4 and clinicopathologic features of colorectal cancer. Methods: PAK1 and PAK4 expression in colorectal cancer patients were investigated via TaqMan real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry and clinical analysis. Results: The relative expression levels of PAK1 and PAK4 gene in colorectal carcinoma tissues were significantly higher than those in normal tissues (P < 0.01). PAK4 expression was higher than PAK1 in the same cancer tissue. The expression of PAK1 and PAK4 increased gradually with the clinical stages in carcinoma tissues (P < 0.01). PAK1 expression was higher in lymph node positive patients, and PAK4 expression was higher in infiltration into serous layer patients (P < 0.05). PAK1 overexpression group has a higher recurrence/metastasis rate compared with that of the PAK1 low expression group. Followup analysis showed that the median progression-free survival time of the PAK1 high expression group was significantly shorter than that of the PAK1 low expression group. Conclusions: PAK1 and PAK4 expression were associated with colorectal cancer metastasis and infiltration, PAK1 high expression may indicate poor prognosis of colorectal cancer. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available