4.5 Article

Enhanced responsiveness to T-cell help causes loss of B-lymphocyte tolerance to a β-cell neo-self-antigen in type 1 diabetes prone NOD mice

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 12, Pages 3413-3425

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201040817

Keywords

Anergy; B lymphocytes; Self-tolerance; Transgenic mice; Type 1 diabetes

Categories

Funding

  1. Clive and Vera Ramaciotti Foundation
  2. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation [1-2005-1087]
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia [402727]
  4. NHMRC
  5. University of New South Wales

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Self-reactive B lymphocytes contribute to type 1 diabetes pathogenesis as APC and auto-Ab producers in NOD mice and humans. To shed light on the mechanisms responsible for the breakdown in B-lymphocyte self-tolerance to beta-cell Ag, we utilised a model whereby hen-egg lysozyme (HEL)-specific Ig Tg (IgHEL-Tg)-Tg B lymphocytes were allowed to develop in or were transferred into mice expressing the HEL Tg under an insulin promoter (insHEL-Tg). IgHEL-Tg B lymphocytes enhanced type 1 diabetes susceptibility of insHEL-Tg NOD mice. A comparison of the tolerogenic activity of IgHEL-Tg B lymphocytes with NOD and non-autoimmune-prone C57BL/6 genetic backgrounds showed that both were rendered anergic in the presence of insHEL when competing with polyclonal B lymphocytes. Nevertheless, NOD IgHEL-Tg B lymphocytes transferred into insHEL-Tg mice were more readily susceptible to rescue from anergy than their C57BL/6 counterparts, following provision of in vivo T-cell help. The different tolerogenic outcomes were an intrinsic property of B lymphocytes rather than being related to the quality of T-cell help, with the defective response being at least partially controlled by genes mapping to insulin-dependent diabetes (Idd) susceptibility loci on Chromosome 1 (Idd5) and 4 (Idd9/11).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available