4.1 Article

Monitoring stress in fish by applying image analysis to their skin mucous cells

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages 107-111

Publisher

PAGEPRESS PUBL
DOI: 10.4081/ejh.2010.e22

Keywords

fish; image analysis; mucous cells; nitrate; oxygen; stress

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several authors have previously demonstrated that the number of the skin mucous cells of fish is affected by many stressors. In the present study, two experiments were conducted in order to examine the effects of two common environmental conditions on the morphology of skin of sea bass and particularly on the number and diameter of skin mucous cells. In the first experiment, two groups of sea bass (mean weight 155.6 +/- 10.3 g SD) were maintained in two different concentrations of nitrate, 100 and 700 ppm respectively, for 48 h, while a third group was used as control. In the second experiment, sea bass (initial mean weight 78.9 +/- 3.1 g SD) were divided into four groups and each group was maintained in a different level of oxygen for 9 weeks. The oxygen concentration in each group was: 3.6 +/- 0.2 ppm, 4.7 +/- 0.2 ppm, 6.2 +/- 0.2 ppm and 8.2 +/- 0.2 ppm. In both experiments the effects of the two environmental factors on the morphology of the fish skin were examined histologically and a software containing a visual basic script macro, allowing quantification of the skin mucous cells, was used to analyze the skin tissue sections. Concerning the overall morphology of the skin and the diameter of the skin mucous cells, no differences were noted in both experiments (P>0.05). It was demonstrated however, that fish maintained in the lowest oxygen level and fish maintained in the highest concentration of nitrate exhibited significantly increased number of mucous cells per skin area (mm(2)). There is evidence that the enumeration of the skin mucous cells of fish can be used to monitor stress in fish.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available