4.2 Article

Normalization of free light chain kappa/lambda ratio is a robust prognostic indicator of favorable outcome in patients with multiple myeloma

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages 134-141

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12050

Keywords

multiple myeloma; free light chain; response criteria; complete response; prognosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To clarify the impact of serum free light chain (sFLC) ratio normalization in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated with novel agents. Patients and methods Treatment response in 126 consecutive patients over 7 yr was assessed by IMWG criteria and sFLC assay. Results Thirty-four patients (27%) showed complete response (CR), 37 (29%) very good partial response (VGPR), 39 (31%) partial response (PR), and 16 (13%) stable disease (SD) or less at a median follow-up of 28 months. Fifty-two patients (41%) with sFLC ratio normalization showed superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those who did not (3-yr OS, 94% vs. 48%; P < 0.001). This favorable effect of sFLC ratio normalization occurred irrespective of high (>1000 mg/dL) or low (<100 mg/dL) baseline sFLC. Rates of normal sFLC ratio were as follows: CR, 69%; VGPR, 64%; PR, 16%; and SD or less, 0%. OS was significantly superior in patients with than without normal sFCL ratio in respective response groups. Although various factors (advanced age >70, high LDH, ISS stage 3) showed negative prognostic impacts on PFS and OS on univariate analysis, normal sFLC ratio and achievement of CR emerged as the strongest prognostic predictors for longer OS in MM patients on multivariate analysis. Conclusions This study demonstrated the significance of obtaining normal sFLC ratio independent of other clinical variables. Analysis of sFLC ratio could identify the favorable group of patients as well as immunofixation test and support the inclusion of sFLC ratio as part of the response criteria for MM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available