4.3 Article

Outcomes of endoscopic human thrombin injection in the management of gastric varices

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages 846-852

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000119

Keywords

endoscopy; gastric varices; gastrointestinal bleeding; portal hypertension; thrombin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Endoscopic human thrombin injection appears to be a technically simple and efficacious alternative to tissue adhesives with fewer complications; however, data remain limited. We analysed our experience using endoscopic human thrombin injection for gastric varices in a tertiary referral liver unit. Methods Thirty patients received thrombin injection for gastric varices between December 2008 and January 2013. Twenty patients (67%) had active bleeding or signs of recent bleeding at endoscopy. Ten patients (33%) received thrombin for prophylaxis of rebleeding: secondary (eight patients) and primary (two patients). Results The mean thrombin dose/injection was 1100 IU (range 400-2500); the mean number of sessions was two (range 1-9), with no reported complications. Haemostasis was achieved in 18 out of 20 (90%) patients treated acutely. Failure to control bleeding (bleeding before day 5) was seen in seven patients: three died and four were managed successfully [ two with further thrombin and two using a salvage transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPSS)]. Rebleeding occurred in a further four patients, all managed successfully with salvage TIPSS. In the prophylaxis group, rebleeding occurred in two out of 10 patients. The median follow-up period was 672 days (interquartile range 92-1331). One patient underwent liver transplantation. Ten deaths occurred in total: four due to gastric variceal bleeding. Six-week survival was 83%. In cases in which TIPSS was precluded, 91% of patients (10 out of 11 patients) were managed successfully with thrombin. Conclusion Endoscopic thrombin therapy for gastric variceal bleeding may have most utility as a safe and easily applied bridge to more definitive therapy, in secondary prophylaxis of rebleeding and in cases in which TIPSS is precluded. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26: 846-852 (C) 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available