4.1 Article

Light intensity affects spatial distribution of Heteroptera in deciduous forests

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 106, Issue 2, Pages 241-252

Publisher

CZECH ACAD SCI, INST ENTOMOLOGY
DOI: 10.14411/eje.2009.032

Keywords

Light regime; diversity; Heteroptera; community structure; vertical and horizontal stratification; nemoral fauna

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies on the effect of varying light intensity oil the spatial distribution of flying insect communities arc rare, particularly in complex ecosystems like forests. The horizontal and vertical distribution of Heteroptera was studied at different scales in a large deciduous forest area, the Steigerwald, in southern Germany. Diversity was affected by (1) vertical position: it was significantly higher near the ground than in the canopy of beech-dominated forests but similar in oak-dominated forests within the canopy of beech-dominated forests, diversity was significantly higher in the upper than in the lower canopy of intermixed oak trees but similar in beech trees (2) canopy cover, but in oak forests the response depended on the vertical position: increasing significantly close to the forest floor with decreasing canopy cover, but showing all opposite trend in the canopy so that in sparse stands (little canopy cover) diversity was significantly higher near the ground, whereas where the forest canopy was medium or dense diversity was higher in the canopy. Moreover, community composition of Heteroptera near the ground differed front that in the canopy in both forest types and near the ground between stands in oak-dominated forest that had canopies of different densities. Results clearly indicate that light intensity is an important direct or indirect factor structuring Heteroptera communities. While in the canopy differences in leaf quality and microhabitats might be important, near the forest floor it is more likely to be the diversity of herbaceous plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available