4.6 Article

Distribution of the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance in Mexican children and adolescents

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 166, Issue 2, Pages 301-306

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-11-0844

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. SHIGO-CONACYT [2002020201]
  2. FAI-UASLP [CO2-10-13.53]
  3. Mexican Social Security Institute Foundation
  4. Civil Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Several cutoff points of the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; varying from 2.5 to 4.0) have been suggested for diagnosing IR in youth. In this study, we determined the distribution of the HOMA-IR in Mexican children and adolescents. Design and methods: A total of 6132 children and adolescents from San Luis Potosi, Leo ' n, Queretaro, and Durango, which are cities in central and northern Mexico, were enrolled in a population-based cross-sectional study. Eligible participants were apparently healthy children and adolescents aged 6-18 years. Pregnancy and the presence of chronic illnesses were exclusion criteria. Results: A total of 3701 (60.3%) girls and 2431 (39.7%) boys were included in this study. In the overall population, the mean body mass index, insulin levels, and fasting glucose levels were 21.8G1.3 kg/m 2, 7.1G3.2 mU/ml, and 86.2G10.0 mg/dl respectively. The concentrations of insulin and fasting glucose gradually increased from 6 to 12 years of age, whereas the concentrations tended to plateau in the 13- to 18-year-old population. The absolute mean of the HOMA-IR was 2.89G0.7. The HOMA-IR gradually increased with age and reached a plateau at 13 years of age. Conclusions: Because the insulin concentrations, glucose levels, and HOMA-IR exhibited a gradual increase with age that was not related to obesity, our results suggested that the evaluation of IR in children should be based on percentiles of the HOMA-IR rather than a dichotomous value derived from a single cutoff point.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available