4.6 Article

Physical function measurements predict mortality in ambulatory older men

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 379-386

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eci.12056

Keywords

Functional status measurements; mortality; older men; physical function measurements; physical performance measurements; Timed up and Go test

Funding

  1. Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek - Vlaanderen (FWO
  2. Research Foundation - Flanders) [G0662.07, G0867.11]
  3. Novartis Belgium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background To assess and compare the predictive value of physical function measurements (PFMs) for all-cause mortality in older men and to evaluate the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) as a predictor in subjects with underlying comorbidity. Design Observational study of a population-based sample of 352 ambulatory older men aged 7186 at study baseline. The Rapid disability rating scale-2, 36-Item short form health survey, Grip strength, Five times sit-to-stand test, Standing balance, and TUG were determined at baseline. Associations with all-cause mortality were assessed using Cox proportional hazard analyses. Age, Body mass index (BMI), smoking status, education, physical activity and cognitive status were included as confounders. Follow-up exceeded 15years. Comorbidity status was categorized into cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diabetes mellitus. Results All examined PFMs were associated with all-cause mortality. TUG was the best predictor (adjusted HR per SD increase=1 center dot 58, 95% CI=1 center dot 401 center dot 79, P<0 center dot 001) for global mortality and continued to be predictive in subjects with cardiovascular disease (adjusted HR per SD increase=1 center dot 80, 95% CI=1 center dot 402 center dot 33, P<0 center dot 001). Conclusions The assessment of physical functioning is important in the evaluation of older persons. We encourage the use of the TUG as a reliable, quick and feasible screening tool in clinical settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available